Saturday, January 23, 2010

Claims Made Malpractice Insurance What Do You Think Of These Health Care Reforms?

What do you think of these Health Care reforms? - claims made malpractice insurance

1. Even the playing field for the profitable insurance companies can sell policies across state borders, how do car insurance. Thus, as motor insurance, the interest of policyholders to keep the cost of healthcare.

With the example of car insurance, people pay reference volumes on the risk-pool (16-24 men is significantly higher in female 40-50). The analogy simply translated to Medicare, where the smoking policy holders who do not eat fatty foods, etc., to higher premiums on a voluntary basis and pay quarterly blood - urine. To achieve this reduced, the tenant would have to voluntarily submit to such tests. Otherwise, the assumed rate of smoking would be / / + fat lazy reference rate for sex and age group.



2. Government in health care. Medicare Fund could be brought (the person to the taxpayer HSA to pay the stolen money) for him. HSA funds could be used for medical treatment. This must be for those with interest paid in them back. At the same time, this would considerably the quantity of waste, fraud and abuse in health insurance at reduced power.



3. Claims for medical malpractice, and require certain loser pays all claims misconduct with an application to the Medical Commission of the State are licensed by the doctor. "99% of the time, these attacks against doctors are just legalizing blackmail.'s Lawyer threatened that nebulous for $ 1 million for some companies to sue the insurance crime corresponds to 250K disappear for further environmental pollution. If the risk in force, the attorney is elimination of the extortion racket that pushes insurance prices.'ve also demanded that the goose that lays golden eggs, killed, further reducing the incentive for ambulances were hunters do not realize that doctors, hospitals and insurance companies.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think it sucks. It cuts its funding, fucked someones. The doctors have too much debt, they do not want to work, free or slightly above. Funding by cutting programs, etc. This is a sh! T plan. The reform that is necessary, the fraud and they do not lock $ 10 an aspirin in the hospital free of charge. The reform is not to reduce services and interference.

Anonymous said...

I think it sucks. It cuts its funding, fucked someones. The doctors have too much debt, they do not want to work, free or slightly above. Funding by cutting programs, etc. This is a sh! T plan. The reform that is necessary, the fraud and they do not lock $ 10 an aspirin in the hospital free of charge. The reform is not to reduce services and interference.

Anonymous said...

Their proposal makes little sense to include the classical liberals, because it leaves control of the equation of his tenacious will. Their number three more than the half the problem, but we must bear in mind that 99% of Congress, former lawyers and representatives of political parties in his second, his personal interest in the third and maybe just maybe, the representatives of the Board of the American people.

Anonymous said...

Excellent and I can not yet rated. I hope that the government does not presume to know what not to plunge the best for the people and in a kind of socialist system, but also where we are headed.

Anonymous said...

Excellent and I can not yet rated. I hope that the government does not presume to know what not to plunge the best for the people and in a kind of socialist system, but also where we are headed.

Post a Comment